From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Fri Jun 17 19:37:16 2005 X-Original-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Delivered-To: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de Subject: Re: [MiNT] XAAES slow? From: Evan Langlois To: MiNT List In-Reply-To: <1119028842.15790.29.camel@linuxbox> References: <1118934446.15790.7.camel@linuxbox> <0007b541.01948d720389@smtp.t-online.de> <1118973980.15790.24.camel@linuxbox> <1119028842.15790.29.camel@linuxbox> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:35:16 -0500 Message-Id: <1119029716.19495.8.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - esc14.midphase.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - fishpool.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - CoolRunningConcepts.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-To: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on relay.boerde.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 tagged_above=-50.5 required=7.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 19:20 +0200, Odd Skancke wrote: > Came to think of it .. what have you set your 'redraw_timeout' to? This > is a timeout value XaAES uses to allow for clients to service its > WM_REDRAWS. If all WM_REDRAWS are not serviced before this timeout, the > clients that are being marked as "lagging" will have its WM_REDRAW queue > reset and a full set of WM_REDRAWs are sent for each of its windows. > Perhaps this is what happens here? Try to enlarge this value (I use a > value of 2000 on the Milan, could be enough with 1000 on 060 Hades). So, slower applications get MORE redraw events?